Copies of spam IEEE Conferences emails that advertise fake IEEE conferences.
These IEEE conferences have no scientific merit and their only purpose is making money.
Check http://diehimmelistschoen.blogspot.com/ for the quality of the proceedings of a typical
spamvertized IEEE conference.
I will add more spam as arriving:
As you know, Dr. KOYLE (a former IEEE Officer) said: "many IEEE Conferences have
already published SCIGEN auto-generated papers without any kind of review ..."
Criticism concerning IEEE
Except WMSCI many fake papers appeared recently in several IEEE conferences,
because the IEEE grants its name and its logo to many local organizers that without
any review process http://jeffreybeall.blogspot.com/, without reading any of the
submitted papers http://anti-ieee.blogspot.com/.
It is being argued that such conferences only exist to make money out of
researchers that are looking for a simple way to publish their work
http://bogus-conferences.blogspot.com Suddenly new publishers appeared like IARIA,
http://www.iaria.org and HIGHSCI http://www.highsci.org. As seen from their web sites,
IARIA and HIGHSCI use the name of IEEE and the IEEE publishing services,
thus attracting numerous papers. Some people to test some conference go further
and sent the paper "A Statistical Method For Women That Can Help Our Sexual Education" in
the IEEE Conference organized by IARIA. This paper receive automatical acceptance within a
few hours with simultaneus "command" of direct payment.
Unfortunately this paper was not published because the authors did not pay the registration fee.
However the letter of acceptance is published on the web and anybody can check it:
A paper titled "Towards the Simulation of E-Commerce" by Herbert Schlangemann got
accepted as a reviewed paper at the
"International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering" (CSSE)
and was briefly in the IEEE Xplore Database.
The author is named after the Swedish short film Der Schlangemann.
Furthermore the author was invited to be a session chair during the conference
Read the official Herbert Schlangemann Blog for details.
The official review comment: "This paper presents cooperative technology and
classical Communication. In conclusion, the result shows that though the
much-touted amphibious algorithm for the refinement of randomized algorithms is
impossible, the well-known client-server algorithm for
the analysis of voice-over- IP by Kumar and Raman runs in _(n) time. The authors
can clearly identify important features of visualization of DHTs and analyze them
insightfully. It is recommended that the authors should develop ideas more cogently,
organizes them more logically, and connects them with clear transitions"
In 2009, the same incident happened and Herbert Schlangemann's latest fake paper "
"PlusPug: A Methodology for the Improvement of Local-Area Networks"" has been accepted
for oral presentation at another international computer science conference (http://www.ieee-ecommerce.com/).
Recently, Denis Baggi, Chairman, IEEE CS confessed that " Selection criteria such a refereeing etc. are
meaningless", probably means that IEEE has accepted the unreliability and bogusity of its conferences.
Denis Baggi also adds: "Articles should be written only if someone has something to tell others,
in which case the validity of the paper is obvious":
See http://diehimmelistschoen.blogspot.com/2008/12/full-paper-is-now-available-for.html#comments and